<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.0 20120330//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1.dtd">
<article article-type="review-article" dtd-version="1.0" xml:lang="en" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">CC</journal-id>
<journal-id journal-id-type="nlm-ta">Cardiol Croat</journal-id>
<journal-title-group>
<journal-title>Cardiologia Croatica</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="pubmed">Cardiol. Croat.</abbrev-journal-title>
</journal-title-group>
<issn pub-type="ppub">1848-543X</issn>
<issn pub-type="epub">1848-5448</issn>
<publisher><publisher-name>Croatian Cardiac Society</publisher-name></publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">CC_2013_8_12_467-470</article-id>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.15836/ccar.2013.467</article-id>
<article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Professional article</subject></subj-group>
</article-categories>
<title-group>
<article-title>New doses &#x2014; new treatment options</article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Mesko</surname><given-names>Jasna</given-names></name></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Brus</surname><given-names>Sanja</given-names></name></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Groselj</surname><given-names>Mateja</given-names></name></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><name><surname>Barbic-Zagar</surname><given-names>Breda</given-names></name></contrib>
<aff id="aff1"><institution>Krka, d. d., Novo mesto</institution>, <country country="si">Slovenia</country></aff>
</contrib-group>
<author-notes>
<corresp id="cor1">Correspondence to Breda Barbic-Zagar, Krka d. d., Dunajska 65, SLO-1000 Ljubljana, Slovenija; Phone: +386-1-4571-339; E-mail: <email xlink:href="breda.zagar@krka.biz">breda.zagar@krka.biz</email></corresp></author-notes>
<pub-date date-type="pub" publication-format="electronic"><month>12</month><year>2013</year></pub-date>
<pub-date date-type="pub" publication-format="print"><month>12</month><year>2013</year></pub-date>
<volume>8</volume>
<issue>12</issue>
<fpage>467</fpage>
<lpage>470</lpage>
<permissions>
<copyright-statement>Croatian Cardiac Society</copyright-statement>
<copyright-year>2013</copyright-year>
<copyright-holder>Croatian Cardiac Society</copyright-holder>
</permissions>
<abstract>
<title>SUMMARY</title>
<p>Dyslipidemia is one of the most important and common modifiable risk factors for cardiovascular disease (CVD). There are many different types of lipid lowering medicines, but till this date statins have remained the only medicines proven to reduce cardiovascular mortality and morbidity in patients with and without established CVD. This is why they have become the mainstay of therapeutic guidelines. In recent years, guidelines for the management of dyslipidemia and on CVD prevention have mandated even lower target lipid levels. These were accepted based on the results from clinical studies, including the results of meta-analyses, which demonstrated that further lowering of LDL cholesterol produced additional benefits, without new or unexpected safety issues. Moreover, clinical studies have shown that even a small reduction of LDL cholesterol has a significant clinical effect and that every 1% reduction in the LDL cholesterol level reduces the relative risk for major coronary heart disease events by approximately 1%. Despite the known benefits of reaching target lipid levels, the majority of patients, especially in secondary prevention, are not reaching them. Statins are usually prescribed at lower doses and often not up-titrated to achieve the therapeutic goals. Having a complete range of doses can be one of the approaches to improve the success rate in reaching target lipid levels in the management of hyperlipidemia. It could help improve clinical outcomes and provide maximum benefits of statin treatment for the patients.</p>
</abstract>
<kwd-group kwd-group-type="author"><title>KEYWORDS: </title><kwd>LDL cholesterol</kwd><kwd>guidelines</kwd><kwd>target lipid levels</kwd><kwd>statins</kwd><kwd>cardiovascular risk</kwd></kwd-group>
</article-meta>
</front>
<body>
<p>Dyslipidemia is one of the most important and common modifiable risk factors for cardiovascular disease (CVD). Lipid-lowering therapy is an integral part of intervention strategies in the prevention of CVD. Till this date, statins have remained the only hypolipidemics proven to reduce cardiovascular mortality and morbidity in patients with and without established CVD. This is why they have become the mainstay of therapeutic guidelines for the CVD management. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r1"><italic>1</italic></xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r2"><italic>2</italic></xref>)</p>
<p>In recent years, guidelines for the management of dyslipidemia and on CVD prevention have placed greater emphasis on reaching target lipid levels and have introduced lower targets for patients at very high risk. In these patients, LDL cholesterol should be lowered to below 1.8 mmol/l or, if this target is unachievable, LDL cholesterol should be reduced at least by 50%. LDL cholesterol reduction by over 50% can be achieved with atorvastatin or rosuvastatin, the two most effective statins on the market. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r1"><italic>1</italic></xref>-<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r3"><italic>3</italic></xref>) New treatment targets in dyslipidemia were established based on the results from clinical studies, including two meta-analyses by the Cholesterol Treatment Trialists&#x2019; (CTT) Collaboration. Findings suggested that lowering of LDL cholesterol to lower therapeutic targets could produce additional benefits, without new or unexpected safety issues. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r4"><italic>4</italic></xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r5"><italic>5</italic></xref>) The first meta-analysis has shown that every 1 mmol/l reduction in LDL cholesterol is associated with a corresponding 20-25% reduction in CVD mortality and non-fatal myocardial infarction. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r4"><italic>4</italic></xref>) The second cycle of analyses has shown that the reduction in major cardiovascular events is directly proportional to the absolute LDL reduction that is achieved, and that further benefit is gained from more intensive statin therapy even if LDL cholesterol is already lower than 2.0 mmol/l. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r5"><italic>5</italic></xref>) Moreover, other clinical studies have indicated that even a small reduction of LDL cholesterol has a significant clinical effect. Every 1% reduction in the LDL cholesterol level reduces the relative risk for major coronary heart disease (CHD) events by approximately 1%. Therefore, every 1% reduction counts and leads to a greater clinical benefit for the patient. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r6"><italic>6</italic></xref>) Rosuvastatin and atorvastatin, the two most potent statins on the market, which can produce a greater than 50% reduction in LDL cholesterol levels, could therefore halve the CHD risk over a 5-year period. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r3"><italic>3</italic></xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r6"><italic>6</italic></xref>) The finding &#x2018;the lower the LDL cholesterol concentration, the greater the risk reduction&#x2019; was also established in primary and secondary prevention of stroke. A meta-analysis of randomised trials of statins in combination with other preventive strategies has shown that each 1 mmol/l decrease in LDL cholesterol equates to a reduction in the relative risk for stroke of 21%. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r7"><italic>7</italic></xref>) (<xref ref-type="table" rid="t1">Table 1</xref>)</p>
<table-wrap id="t1" position="float">
<label>Table 1</label><caption><title>Cardiovascular risk groups and recommended LDL cholesterol goals. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r2"><italic>2</italic></xref>)</title>
</caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<col width="100%"/>
<thead>
<tr>
<th valign="top" align="left" scope="col" style="border-left: solid 0.50pt; border-top: solid 0.50pt; border-right: solid 0.50pt; border-bottom: solid 0.50pt; background-color:rgb(255,131,121)">Very high risk: LDL-c &lt; 1.8 mmol/l or at least 50% reduction</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left" style="border-left: solid 0.50pt; border-top: solid 0.50pt; border-right: solid 0.50pt; border-bottom: solid 0.50pt">known CVD<break/>diabetes (type 1 or type 2) with 1 or more CV risk factors and/or target organ damage<break/>severe chronic kidney disease<break/>asymptomatic patients with SCORE &#x2265; 10%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left" style="border-left: solid 0.50pt; border-top: solid 0.50pt; border-right: solid 0.50pt; border-bottom: solid 0.50pt; background-color:rgb(255,174,129)">High risk: LDL-c &lt; 2.5 mmol/l</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left" style="border-left: solid 0.50pt; border-top: solid 0.50pt; border-right: solid 0.50pt; border-bottom: solid 0.50pt">very high levels of individual risk factor (dyslipidemia and hypertension)<break/>diabetes (type 1 or type 2) without CV risk factors or target organ damage<break/>moderate chronic kidney disease<break/>asymptomatic patients with SCORE &#x2265; 5% and 10%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left" style="border-left: solid 0.50pt; border-top: solid 0.50pt; border-right: solid 0.50pt; border-bottom: solid 0.50pt; background-color:rgb(255,230,125)">Moderate risk: LDL-c &lt; 3.0 mmol/l</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left" style="border-left: solid 0.50pt; border-top: solid 0.50pt; border-right: solid 0.50pt; border-bottom: solid 0.50pt">asymptomatic patients with SCORE &#x2265; 1% and 5%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left" style="border-left: solid 0.50pt; border-top: solid 0.50pt; border-right: solid 0.50pt; border-bottom: solid 0.50pt; background-color:rgb(129,243,167)">Low risk: LDL-c &lt; 3.0 mmol/l</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left" style="border-left: solid 0.50pt; border-top: solid 0.50pt; border-right: solid 0.50pt; border-bottom: solid 0.50pt">asymptomatic patients with SCORE &lt; 1%</td>
</tr>
</tbody></table></table-wrap>
<p>Parallel to clinical outcome trials, imaging studies have been conducted to examine the effects of statin therapy on the progression of atherosclerosis. The results of studies with high-dose atorvastatin or rosuvastatin therapy demonstrated a significant regression of coronary atherosclerosis. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r8"><italic>8</italic></xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r9"><italic>9</italic></xref>)</p>
<p>Additionally, a study which compared the effect on percent atheroma volume (PAV) measured by intravascular ultrasound between the treatment with rosuvastatin 40 mg and atorvastatin 80 mg has found that the effects of these two treatments do not differ significantly. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r9"><italic>9</italic></xref>) The studies suggest that there is potential for a more optimistic strategy, in which aggressive lipid-modulating therapies could actually reverse the atherosclerotic disease process. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r8"><italic>8</italic></xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r9"><italic>9</italic></xref>)</p>
<p>The evidence about the benefits of lowering LDL cholesterol to specific targets and of using sufficient doses to reach these targets is stronger than ever. However, many high-risk patients, particularly in secondary prevention, do not reach LDL cholesterol goals as defined in guidelines. According to the recently presented data from the EUROASPIRE IV study, a majority of coronary patients with dyslipidemia are taking lipid lowering drugs (almost exclusively statins) but are still inadequately treated. More than 40% of these patients do not reach LDL cholesterol levels &lt;2.5 mmol/l. According to new guidelines, the target should be even lower, which results in even greater percentage of patients not reaching target lipid levels. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r10"><italic>10</italic></xref>) These patients are, despite treatment, at an increased risk for CV events.</p>
<p>The challenges for clinical practice remain to be confronted. Despite the well-established benefits and abundance of clinical management guidelines strongly advocating statin use in patients at higher CV risk, statins are usually prescribed at their lower doses and often not up-titrated to achieve lipid goals. Given the fact that the main purpose of reducing lipid levels is to gain the maximum clinical benefits, the guidelines address the need to initiate and then up-titrate drug therapies to achieve the treatment goals and improve eventfree survival. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r1"><italic>1</italic></xref>)</p>
<p>Krka has recognised this need and offers, as the first producer in the world, both potent statins in two additional doses, Atoris&#x00AE; (atorvastatin) 30 and 60 mg and Roswera&#x00AE; (rosuvastatin) 15 and 30 mg. Its broadest range of statin dosage options on the market allows adjusting the dose to every patient&#x2019;s characteristics and needs. Many patients at an increased CV risk who are not reaching target lipid levels with currently available treatments, would have better chances of reaching them with atorvastatin 30 mg or rosuvastatin 15 mg. Atorvastatin 60 mg or rosuvastatin 30 mg can be particularly suitable as maintenance doses in patients in secondary prevention, e.g. after a CVD event, and in patients who need more intensive lipid management.</p>
<p>The efficacy and safety of Krka&#x2019;s statins have been demonstrated in over 35,000 patients. A most recent non-interventional clinical study with Krka&#x2019;s rosuvastatin, which also investigated additional strengths, confirmed the efficacy and safety of Krka&#x2019;s rosuvastatin and its linear dose-response relationship. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r11"><italic>11</italic></xref>) Extensive clinical trials, together with vertically integrated production complying with the strictest European and international production and pharmaceutical standards, have played a crucial role in building trust in Krka&#x2019;s medicines and have made Krka a leading producer of statins on the markets of Central, Eastern and South-Eastern Europe. Krka&#x2019;s atorvastatin is the most prescribed statin on these markets. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r12"><italic>12</italic></xref>)</p>
<p>Having a complete range of doses can be one of the approaches to improve the success rate in reaching target lipidlevels in the management of hyperlipidemia. It might help improve clinical outcomes and provide maximum benefits of statin treatment for the patients. A better adherence to guidelines- based therapies could potentially reduce the public health and economic burden imposed by CVD.</p>
</body>
<back>
<ref-list>
<title>Literature</title>
<ref id="r1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><collab>European Association for Cardiovascular Prevention &amp; Rehabilitation</collab><name><surname>Reiner</surname><given-names>Z</given-names></name><name><surname>Catapano</surname><given-names>AL</given-names></name><name><surname>De Backer</surname><given-names>G</given-names></name><etal/></person-group>. <article-title>ESC Committee for Practice Guidelines (CPG) 2008-2010 and 2010-2012 Committees. ESC/EAS Guidelines for the management of dyslipidaemias: the Task Force for the management of dyslipidaemias of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Atherosclerosis Society (EAS).</article-title> <source>Eur Heart J</source>. <year>2011</year>;<volume>32</volume>:<fpage>1769</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>818</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">21712404</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="r2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Perk</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>De Backer</surname><given-names>G</given-names></name><name><surname>Gohlke</surname><given-names>H</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> <article-title>European Guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice (version 2012). The Fifth Joint Task Force of the European Society of Cardiology and Other Societies on Cardiovascular Disease Prevention in Clinical Practice (constituted by representatives of nine societies and by invited experts). Developed with the special contribution of the European Association for Cardiovascular Prevention &amp; Rehabilitation (EACPR).</article-title> <source>Eur Heart J</source>. <year>2012</year>;<volume>33</volume>(<issue>13</issue>):<fpage>1635</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>701</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/eurheartj/ehs092</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">22555213</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="r3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Jones</surname><given-names>PH</given-names></name><name><surname>Davidson</surname><given-names>MH</given-names></name><name><surname>Stein</surname><given-names>EA</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> <article-title>Comparison of the efficacy and safety of rosuvastatin versus atorvastatin, simvastatin, and pravastatin across doses (STELLAR* Trial).</article-title> <source>Am J Cardiol</source>. <year>2003</year>;<volume>92</volume>:<fpage>152</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>60</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/S0002-9149(03)00530-7</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">12860216</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="r4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Baigent</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Keech</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Kearney</surname><given-names>PM</given-names></name><etal/><collab>Cholesterol Treatment Trialists&#x2019; (CTT) Collaboration</collab></person-group>. <article-title>Efficacy and safety of cholesterol-lowering treatment: prospective meta-analysis of data from 90 056 participants in 14 randomised trials of statins.</article-title> <source>Lancet</source>. <year>2005</year>;<volume>366</volume>:<fpage>1267</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>78</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/S0140-6736(05)67394-1</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">16214597</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="r5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Baigent</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Blackwell</surname><given-names>L</given-names></name><name><surname>Emberson</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><etal/><collab>Cholesterol Treatment Trialists&#x2019; (CTT) Collaboration</collab></person-group>. <article-title>Efficacy and safety of more intensive lowering of LDL cholesterol: a meta-analysis of data from 170,000 participants in 26 randomised trials.</article-title> <source>Lancet</source>. <year>2010</year>;<volume>376</volume>:<fpage>1670</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>81</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/S0140-6736(10)61350-5</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">21067804</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="r6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Grundy</surname><given-names>SM</given-names></name><name><surname>Cleeman</surname><given-names>JI</given-names></name><name><surname>Bairey Merz</surname><given-names>CN</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> <article-title>Implications of recent clinical trials for the National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III Guidelines.</article-title> <source>Circulation</source>. <year>2004</year>;<volume>110</volume>:<fpage>227</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>39</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1161/01.CIR.0000133317.49796.0E</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">15249516</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="r7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Amarenco</surname><given-names>P</given-names></name><name><surname>Labreuche</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Lipid management in the prevention of stroke: review and updated meta-analysis of statins for stroke prevention.</article-title> <source>Lancet Neurol</source>. <year>2009</year>;<volume>8</volume>:<fpage>453</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>63</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/S1474-4422(09)70058-4</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">19375663</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="r8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Nissen</surname><given-names>SE</given-names></name><name><surname>Nicholls</surname><given-names>SJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Sipahi</surname><given-names>I</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> <article-title>Effect of very high-intensity statin therapy on regression of coronary atherosclerosis: the ASTEROID trial.</article-title> <source>JAMA</source>. <year>2006</year>;<volume>295</volume>(<issue>13</issue>):<fpage>1556</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>65</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1001/jama.295.13.jpc60002</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">16533939</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="r9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Nicholls</surname><given-names>SJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Ballantyne</surname><given-names>CM</given-names></name><name><surname>Barter</surname><given-names>PJ</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> <article-title>Effect of two intensive statin regimens on progression of coronary disease.</article-title> <source>N Engl J Med</source>. <year>2011</year>;<volume>365</volume>:<fpage>2078</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>87</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1056/NEJMoa1110874</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">22085316</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="r10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="web">ESC Press Office. EUROASPIRE IV reveals success and challenges in secondary prevention of CVD across Europe. European Society of Cardiology [internet]. 2013 [updated 2013 Sep 3, cited 2013 Nov 12]. Available from: <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="http://www.escardio.org/about/press/press-releases/esc13-amsterdam/Pages/euroaspire-iv-success-challenges-secondary-prevention-CVD-europe.aspx">http://www.escardio.org/about/press/press-releases/esc13-amsterdam/Pages/euroaspire-iv-success-challenges-secondary-prevention-CVD-europe.aspx</ext-link></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="r11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other">Final report. Non-interventional follow-up of efficacy and safety of treatment with rosuvastatin (Sorvasta&#x00AE;) in patients with hyperlipidemia and introduction of additional dosage strengths in the clinical practice. Data on file. Krka d. d., Novo Mesto, Slovenia. 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="r12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other">ePharma market, CEGEDIM, IMS, Intellix, Medicube, PharmStandart, PharmaZoom 1-6 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>
